Friday, October 31, 2008

Analogy. Or is it a metaphor? Maybe both. Whatever.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. "Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before, And the first four continued to drink for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.
The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen,
Ph.D. Professor of Economics
University of Georgia

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

8 comments:

Unknown said...

The biggest issue with this analogy is that the sample size of 10 men is not anywhere close to explaining the wealth divergence in America. Make it about 100 (because the taxation system is based on a percentage) for starters.

But I would like to see you explain why the middle two guys have to pay roughly as much as the richest guy in McCain's tax plan. Like that isn't going to piss them off.

I think your analogy does show off what I consider to be the worst problem with income tax. Its total disconnection from the reasons of taxation (no feedback). If everyone had to pay $6 a gallon for gas because of a war in energy rich middle east we might have a different opinion of what we should be doing there and what we should be doing about importing our energy.

BrotherBill said...

Erik,

This election will be over soon and both you and I and everyone else in the states can go back to our day to day lives and we then will stop seeing the words McCain or Obama when neither is there.

Your right, lets make the sample size 1000 if it is based on percentages. It is only more zeros and more people on both ends.

BrotherBill said...

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/irs_screen_grab.member.html


The above data is of course all busllshit becuase I found it on Rush's homepage.

I am not sure if non members can read it, but it is a link to the irs. The numbers are the numbers.

In most current example is 2005

the top 50% of wage earners paid over 96% of income tax share.
The top 25% paid 85%
the top 10% paid 70%
The top 5% paid 59%
the top 1% paid 39%

Kelly said...

I thought this was a baby blog.

Unknown said...

Kelly: This is indeed a baby blog. We are commenting on the debt your baby will inherit!

Anonymous said...

Excellent post Brotherbill...this is a great way to stimulate some much needed dialogue. Both of our current candidates are running on a "change" platform. However, both are proposing more of the same...just slightly different ideas of the same nonsense we have been dealing with since 1913 (the inception of the income tax). The way to stimulate the economy is to reign in government spending and eliminate the IRS and the income tax all together. Sound impossible? It is not. Our country, its government, and its people just need to interpret the constitution as it was originally meant to be used, and revert power back to the states. For more info on the only plan I have read so far regarding taxes that makes any sense at all, check out this link:

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Tax_Reform.htm

Unfortunately, Ron Paul is not a viable candidate in this day and age. However, I think it is due to a faulty system and voters who have become conditioned to accept government in its current form rather than a problem with Ron Paul's platform.

Also..."Rhode Island is neither a road, nor an isalnd....discuss".

Anonymous said...

Sorry, here is the correct link...

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Tax_Reform.htm

Anonymous said...

brilliant! love it.

oh, by the way, didja happen to see obama's aunt is living illegally in PUBLIC housing.

what a joke. get used to it, i suppose.